<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teach yourself Alfresco: Because we&#8217;re too busy to explain it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tenthline.com/blog/2008/04/04/teach-yourself-alfresco-because-were-too-busy-to-explain-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tenthline.com/blog/2008/04/04/teach-yourself-alfresco-because-were-too-busy-to-explain-it/</link>
	<description>Our thoughts on content, identity, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enrico</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthline.com/blog/2008/04/04/teach-yourself-alfresco-because-were-too-busy-to-explain-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthline.com/blog/2008/04/04/teach-yourself-alfresco-because-were-too-busy-to-explain-it/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>In the true FOSS spirit, there is but one solution: contribute to the documentation ourselves.  Of course, that's of absolutely no help to us now.  =P

I must say I'm impressed, though: I'm impressed with how badly their wiki is organized.  Can anybody tell me why the link to their documentation for WCM redirects to an article about their vision for the WCM system?  That's not documentation, that's marketing.  &#62;_&#60;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the true FOSS spirit, there is but one solution: contribute to the documentation ourselves.  Of course, that&#8217;s of absolutely no help to us now.  =P</p>
<p>I must say I&#8217;m impressed, though: I&#8217;m impressed with how badly their wiki is organized.  Can anybody tell me why the link to their documentation for WCM redirects to an article about their vision for the WCM system?  That&#8217;s not documentation, that&#8217;s marketing.  &gt;_&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
